To achieve Step 15, individuals will show that they are aware of their leadership style and also that they can adapt their approach depending on the situation.
In the previous two steps, the idea of leadership styles was introduced, and different styles explored. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach were then explored. This step builds on this further by exploring how different styles work well in different settings and how an excellent leader can adapt their approach to the situation.
The building blocks of this step are learning:
In the last two steps, we have explored different leadership styles and the strengths and weaknesses of each. The critical point to remember is that leadership is not about picking one leadership style and then sticking to it through everything. Indeed, leadership styles are just constructed to think about broad approaches to leadership.
The best leaders think about the situation, and then adapt their approach to that situation. For example, in a crisis leaders might be more autocratic in order to make decisions quickly and ensure clear lines of control. In a high change situation, they might take on more of a mantle of the transformational leader encouraging change. During more stable times, they might invest in their teams with a coaching approach.
This is not easy to do - until we have really mastered the skill, it can be easy to default back to our natural style, that comes easiest to us. Reflecting consciously about our style and whether it is appropriate in the setting is essential until this becomes intuitive.
For these eight broad leadership styles, it is important to be able to recognise when each is effective and ineffective. We can then make good choices about when we deploy each style in different settings.
Autocratic leadership is a style where the leader is the main or only decision-maker. All decisions are made by them, and they expect their decisions to flow through the chain of command to be enacted, unquestioningly, by their team.
When it is an effective approach:
An autocratic leadership approach can be effective when clear decisions need to be made in a short time span, and quickly implemented. This can mean in a crisis situation or when the team is under great pressure.
A bureaucratic or paternalistic leadership style is one where the leader tends to make decisions based on policies and precedent – that is, what has gone before. They generally believe that this is in the best interests of their team to maintain a steady, reliable operation.
Although not against suggestions from their team in the way an autocratic leader might be, they are unlikely to support anything that is new or too different.
When it is an effective approach
This leadership style works well in a stable, predictable environment when there is little external competition or need for change. It works well with individuals who are happy to follow routines and the way things have always been done.
A coaching leadership style focuses on supporting others in the team to feel empowered to make decisions and work through problems, with the leader acting as a facilitator to that process. They are likely to invest heavily in developing the skills of their team and to improve their performance so that the team overall performs better.
When it is an effective approach:
This is an effective approach in a stable environment, where decisions do not have to be rushed. This can help where decisions can be decentralised, and it is possible for team members to have considerable ownership and responsibility for particular areas. It is also helpful when the team needs to be further developed or improved.
A democratic leader focuses on reaching group consensus and a shared approach to decision-making. They see the team’s views as having equal merit to their own, and are willing to defer to the team’s collective opinion over their own. Decisions are often discussed at length and sometimes have to be postponed if a shared position cannot be reached.
When it is an effective approach:
This approach can be effective when there is little hierarchy in the group, and team members consider themselves to be peers with equal contributions to make. It also benefits from there being adequate time for discussions and to make decisions, and a high level of support and trust between team members. It also relies on a high level of alignment between the interests of team members.
This is a hands-off style of leadership, where the leader essentially delegates decision-making authority out to the individuals in the team. This leads to individuals essentially deciding for themselves what to do, what the priorities are, and how they will work.
When it is an effective approach:
This approach is well-suited to a fast-growing team or organisation where speedy decision-making is key. There needs to be an acceptance that some decisions that are made will be incorrect, and some work will have to be abandoned or re-done.
A transactional leadership approach focuses on completing the tasks that need to be done, ensuring that resources are available, and ensuring that appropriate rewards are in place for the completion of tasks. There are very clear roles and responsibilities laid out for team members, and individuals are clear on what the expectations are of them.
When it is an effective approach:
This approach works well when the situation is stable, and the focus is on consistency of work and delivering on clear expectations. It means that efforts are not wasted, and that activity is purposeful. However, over time, individual motivation is likely to wane.
Transformational leadership focuses on change and discontinuity. The leader is always pushing for things to be done differently or better, and there is little patience for maintaining routines if they could be improved or changed. Goals are likely to be stretched and changed over time, and expectations of team members similarly grow and expand.
When it is an effective approach:
This approach can be effective when the organisation is in a rapidly changing, or highly competitive environment when they need to grow or react quickly. It works better when team members are keen and hungry to develop and to be given plenty of opportunities, which is commonly the case in a newer team. It may work less well in an established team, with set ways of working.
A strategic or visionary leader is one who is focused on the big picture of what the team is trying to achieve. This might include thinking about how the team and its work fits into the wider sector and how it relates to the activities of competitors. This sort of leader focuses most of their interest on outside the team and the organisation.
When it is an effective approach:
This can be an effective approach when the external environment is important to the success of the team. To be effective, the leader needs a strong team and other good leaders who can support the day-to-day work of the team, and support and stretch one another.
When leading a team at school or college, there are likely to be circumstances when your natural style is not appropriate for the situation. The person leading the development of a school production in a democratic style may need to be more autocratic and make quick decisions when the main lead is sick or when the scenery falls down mid play. In the same way a more naturally laissez-faire leader, may need to be more transactional when a team presentation deadline is looming and most of the individuals have not provided the information which is needed for the presentation.
The most successful business leaders in the world do not all have the same leadership style, but one thing they will have in common is that they will recognise situations where their own style may not be appropriate for the circumstances and will adapt to a more effective style. This need to adapt is true at every level of leadership in the workplace, where circumstances dictate the need for a different approach. At a time of crisis or when a quick decision is essential, perhaps in an emergency, the laissez-faire leader will need to be more autocratic. When a new approach or way of working is being introduced in a department or office, the strategic leader may need to increase their engagement with coaching or recognise the need and delegate to others who can coach more effectively.
Ina social situation, where the leader may have volunteered or even been recommended for the role, it is important to remember that the group or team are doing the activity out of choice. It is not paid employment nor compulsory. The members of the group can ‘vote with their feet’ and if they are not happy about the leadership they may leave the group and establish a separate team or remain and cause disruption. It is important then that the leader acts in a style that it appropriate for the situation, for example, when an enjoyable group holiday is being planned, most people would not appreciate an autocratic leader telling them where and when they are going and for how long. In this situation, a naturally autocratic leader would need to adapt to a more democratic approach.
To best practise this step of Leadership, apply what you have learnt to a real-life situation. Choose one or more of the activities below, remind yourself of the key points and strategies in the step, and have a go!
To teach this step:
This step can be reinforced whenever learners have a leadership opportunity or when they are working in small groups. The teacher should ask learners to reflect before they begin the task on which leadership style or styles they think would be most effective here, and then they should adapt their approach to that.
This step is best assessed through setting and observing one or two leadership tasks. Learners should reflect beforehand on what approach they are going to take, and then reflect afterwards on whether it worked as they expected. The teacher is looking to understand that learners can connect the right style to the right situation, and actually behave accordingly.
This step is relevant to individuals who want to develop themselves so that they can get the best out of others.
To build this step in the work environment, managers could:
There are plenty of opportunities for building this skill in the workplace:
For those already employed, this step is best assessed through collecting feedback and observing an individual over time. For instance:
During the recruitment process, this step could be assessed for by:
We work with a wide range of organisations, who use the Skills Builder approach in lots of different settings – from youth clubs, to STEM organisations, to careers and employability providers.
We have a lot of materials available to support you to use the Skills Builder Universal Framework with the individuals you work with, including:
We also do a lot of work with organisations who join the Skills Builder Partnership to build the Universal Framework into their work and impact measurement systems. You can find out a lot more using the links below.
At home, you can easily support your child to build their essential skills. The good news is that there
are lots of ways that you can have a big impact, including: